Strategic Inconsistencies and America's Democratic Process Essay

Strategic Inconsistencies and Americas popular Process - Essay ExampleThe executive branch and the military expanding the war into Cambodia with neither the knowledge nor the pay of Congress was a clear violation of the popular process.iEarlier, and in a similar fashion, the entire programme to develop the nuclear bomb and the decision to use them on two Japanese cities in sniffy 1945 was undertaken in strict secrecy. The secrecy of the program was essential to national security and the decision to use it sure shortened the war and probably saved the lives of thousands of US combat troops. However, undertaking the development and use of atomic weapons in strict secrecy can hardly be seen as a model of res publica in action.The removal of the Japanese from the Pacific coast during World War Two and their concentration in internment camps was a clear violation of both their human and civil rights. It may well cast off been necessary, although that is certainly debatable, but, aga in, it is hardly a model of body politic in action.ii During wartime the United States has clearly abandoned democratic principles in favor of military strategy and efficacy. That said, it would be fair to say that virtually every democracy has made the decision when confronted with the question of military strategy versus democratic ideals in the time of war.Since at to the lowest degree the Civil War there has been a hangover from wartime strategy that has infected the democratic process in the aftermath of war. During Reconstruction, Federal troops were placed on the streets in southern cities to enforce law and order. This crying(prenominal) violation of the Constitution, once recognized, was deemed so offensive that it led to posse comitatus legislation in 1878. The law states, Whoever, leave out in cases and under circumstances expressly authorized by the Constitution or Act of Congress, wilfully uses any part of the Army or Air Force as a posse comitatus or otherwise to ex ecute the laws.